The fact that the new Pixels are being compared to the iPhone at all, though, highlights Google's apparent success at coming out with high-end phones that can be compared head-to-head with Apple's iconic design. That could prove to be a key to how well the Pixels perform on the market, considering the devices' equally high-end prices: $649 for the Pixel and $769 for the Pixel XL.
Designed and built by Google, the Pixels replace the company's previous in-house Android brand, the Nexus line, which first launched in 2010. Before unveiling the new smartphones at a launch event earlier this month, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said the Pixels, which are loaded with smart software, represent the shift from a mobile-first world to one led by artificial intelligence.
A review of the top 20 headlines about the Pixels on Google News today showed raves outnumbering criticisms by a score of 15 to five.
Among those weighing in with positive assessments were the Wall Street Journal, Time, CNET, PCWorld, The Verge, Engadget and ZDNet. Reviewers responding with a "meh" included Ars Technica, the New York Times, ABC News and The Telegraph, while Gizmodo's thumbs-down -- "too dumb and ugly to replace your iPhone" -- was a definite outlier.
The Pixels' screens and cameras are the features earning the strongest praise from most reviewers.
"The AMOLED display makes photos look better; even ones taken on...